Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Am Coll Health ; 71(7): 2106-2114, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34788562

RESUMO

Objective: We evaluated the Relaxation Zone (RZ), a room with "relaxation stations" designed to reduce stress in college students. Participants: Participants (N = 994) were enrolled during the 2019 calendar year. Most participants were female (62.8%), freshmen (59.3%), and African American (44.9%). Methods: Students visiting the RZ completed a brief pretest and posttest that measured self-reported stress. Results: Paired sample t-tests across class groups (e.g., freshman, sophomore) revealed a significant reduction in stress from pretest (Mpooled = 6.0) to posttest (Mpooled = 4.5), with medium to large effect sizes (Cohen's d ranging from 0.53 to 0.88) during their first visit. For students having at least two visits (N = 348), an exploratory dose-response analysis demonstrated that an optimal dose of self-guided relaxation ranged from two to eight visits. Conclusions: These findings provide initial evidence that programs like the RZ can reduce student stress within a few visits.

2.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 67(10): e28217, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32453503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) males newly diagnosed with cancer are often faced with making quick decisions about whether to cryopreserve ("bank") sperm prior to treatment initiation. Given that parental influence is crucial among young patients, the present study examines the prevalence of and factors associated with parent recommendation to bank sperm. PROCEDURE: Parents of 13- to 21-year-old males newly diagnosed with cancer and at risk for infertility secondary to impending gonadotoxic treatment completed questionnaires typically within one week of treatment initiation. Medical and sociodemographic data, communication factors, and psychological factors were considered in a logistic regression model of parent report of parental recommendation to bank sperm (yes/no). RESULTS: Surveys from 138 parents (70.3% female) of 117 AYA males (mean age = 16.1 years, SD = 2.0) were analyzed. Over half of parents recommended banking to their sons (N = 82; 59.4%). Parents who received a provider recommendation to bank sperm (odds ratio [OR] = 18.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.20-81.01, P < 0.001) or who believed in the benefits of banking (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 1.02-1.47, P = 0.03) were significantly more likely to recommend sperm banking. CONCLUSIONS: Given parents' role in influencing sperm banking outcomes, provider recommendation and promotion of banking benefits may influence parents and empower initiation of these sensitive discussions with their sons. Utilization of this approach should yield beneficial outcomes regardless of the banking decision.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade/psicologia , Infertilidade Masculina/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/terapia , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Preservação do Sêmen/psicologia , Bancos de Esperma/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/patologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Relações Pais-Filho , Espermatozoides/química , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings ; 27(4): 716-726, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31587132

RESUMO

Vaccination is available to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) types that cause cervical and other cancers. This study aimed to describe and compare vaccine intention among young females with and without a cancer history, in addition to identifying factors associated with a HPV vaccination intention. Vaccine-naïve females (aged 18-26 years, n = 120) and maternal caregivers with vaccine-naïve daughters (aged 9-17 years, n = 197) completed surveys querying HPV vaccination intention, HPV knowledge, and communication, along with sociodemographic, medical, and health belief factors. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for HPV vaccination intention. No differences in vaccine intention were identified across cancer and comparison groups. Vaccine intention and predictors of intention among vaccine-naïve females differ by age, and there is variation in the factors which influence vaccine intention by age group. These results suggest interventions should be tailored based on developmental level.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Intenção , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
4.
Neurol Sci ; 40(Suppl 1): 3-7, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30906966

RESUMO

This paper overviews available literature addressing behavioral and psychological aspects of cluster headache. Behavioral correlates of sleep and drug use are explored, as are the psychological correlates pertaining to psychopathology and cognitive functioning. We conclude with a review of the few investigations addressing adjunctive behavioral treatments for cluster headache, and provide suggestions for possible ways to enhance effects of behavioral interventions for this painful and difficult to treat headache disorder.


Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental , Cefaleia Histamínica/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Cefaleia/terapia , Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Cefaleia Histamínica/diagnóstico , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Humanos , Sono/fisiologia
5.
Cancer ; 124(17): 3567-3575, 2018 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29975417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although survivors of adolescent-onset cancers are at risk of infertility, the majority desire children. Fertility preservation options are available for adolescents, but sperm banking remains underused. To the authors' knowledge, patient factors that influence decisions to bank sperm are poorly understood. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 146 adolescent males who were newly diagnosed with cancer and who completed surveys within 1 week of treatment initiation was performed. Participants, 65% of whom were white, were aged 13 to 21 years (mean, 16.49 years; standard deviation, 2.02 years) and were at risk of infertility secondary to impending gonadotoxic treatment. Participating institutions included 8 leading pediatric oncology centers across the United States and Canada. RESULTS: Of the patients approached, approximately 80.6% participated. Parent recommendation to bank (odds ratio [OR], 4.88; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.15-20.71 [P = .03]), higher Tanner stage (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.60-11.27 [P < .01]), greater perceived benefits (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.77 [P < .01]), and lower social barriers to banking (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96 [P < .01]) were found to be associated with adolescent collection attempts, whereas meeting with a fertility specialist (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.00-11.83 [P = .05]), parent (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.12-8.10 [P = .03]) or provider (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.05-6.77 [P = .04]) recommendation to bank, and greater adolescent self-efficacy to bank (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33 [P = .03]) were found to be associated with successful sperm banking. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents' perceived benefits of sperm banking, higher Tanner stage, and parent recommendation were associated with collection attempts, whereas perceived social barriers decreased this likelihood. Successful banking was associated with greater adolescent self-efficacy, parent and provider recommendation to bank, and consultation with a fertility specialist. Providers should consult with both adolescents and parents regarding fertility preservation, and interventions should be tailored to address barriers to sperm banking while promoting its benefits.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Criopreservação , Preservação da Fertilidade , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Espermatozoides , Adolescente , Comportamento do Adolescente/psicologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idade de Início , Criopreservação/estatística & dados numéricos , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Preservação da Fertilidade/psicologia , Preservação da Fertilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Masculina/prevenção & controle , Infertilidade Masculina/psicologia , Masculino , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicologia , Fatores de Risco , Preservação do Sêmen/métodos , Preservação do Sêmen/psicologia , Preservação do Sêmen/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Bancos de Esperma , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
6.
Fertil Steril ; 108(6): 1043-1049, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29202957

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of parental sociodemographic, communication, and psychological factors on sperm collection attempts among at-risk adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. DESIGN: Prospective, single group, observational study design. SETTING: Pediatric oncology centers. PATIENT(S): Parents (N = 144) of 122 newly diagnosed adolescent males at increased risk for infertility secondary to cancer therapy. INTERVENTION(S): Survey-based assessment of parent factors associated with adolescent collection attempts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Attempt of manual collection of sperm. RESULT(S): Parental recommendation to bank sperm (odds ratio [OR] 3.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-11.76) and perceived self-efficacy to facilitate banking (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02-1.41) were associated with an increased likelihood of making a collection attempt. CONCLUSION(S): Parental recommendation to bank is a critical influence for sperm banking among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. These findings highlight the importance of effective communication between parents, patients, and health-care teams when discussing preservation options. Parent perceptions of their ability to facilitate sperm banking at the time of diagnosis should also be targeted in future interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01152268.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Fertilidade/efeitos da radiação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Infertilidade Masculina/etiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Pais/psicologia , Bancos de Esperma , Espermatozoides , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/fisiopatologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Razão de Chances , Percepção , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...